CCSS Assessment: Change for the better or more of the same?

Front

by Andrew Foster
Twitter @abfosEd

Andrew Foster“Test, test, test.  That’s all we ever do.  These kids are overloaded with tests!”  Ever heard that comment or a similar variation?  Of course you have!  Maybe the words came from your own mouth!  One of the frustrations of teachers, principals, and coaches is the frequency and duration of assessment in the classroom.

One of the reasons testing has become ever-present is the fact that many tests have different purposes and different audiences.  Some are mandated by the state for data collection and comparison, others are required by the district to provide data used for early intervention, and of course many assessments are used by the classroom teacher to adjust instruction and improve learning outcomes.  Many of us have wondered, “Why can’t we develop some great assessments that could serve multiple purposes and reduce the number of tests given each school year?”

The answer has been: alignment, or lack thereof.  In my school, we give two Benchmark assessments written by company X, required by our district, but aligned to our state standards only about 80% of the time.  Then we take the Standards Based Assessment which is our NCLB accountability piece.  Meanwhile, our school has devoloped quarterly assessments that help us determine how we are progressing toward our goals each nine weeks.  Put it all together, and our students take SEVEN major assessments each year, not including classroom quizzes and unit tests.

Enter the Common Core State Standards and the need for assessments that provide actionable data and are 100% aligned to required instruction.  There are two main Assessment Consortia to which state education departments are looking for CCSS-aligned assessments.

  • The SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) Design  Generally considered to be a more difficult, task-based assessment.  SBAC is currently trying to design a system that would give local districts and schools the opportunity to tailor the tool to their assessment needs throughout the early parts of the school year, then all students would take a common summative assessment.  SBAC is expected to be fully operational by 2015.  Click the link for more details.
  • Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)  Generally considered to include more traditional, item-based assessment, but with new task-based components.  PARCC would prescribe a more structured set of early assessments with flexible timing followed by the summative accountability assessments at the end of the school year.  Click the link for more details.
So which approach is better?  Or are we still missing the boat when it comes to quality, meaningful assessment?  Will these assessments solve the problems and challenges mentioned above?  How will we insure that all students have equal opportunity to do their best on the tests?  I would love to hear your thoughts on all of those questions.  More on CCSS next-generation assessment next week.

Common Core Standards and Science

Front Here is a collection of recent videos with education experts talking about the impact of the Common Core State Standards on science education. Literacy in Other Disciplines If you can’t see this video, click here. STS Talk Highlight: The Common Core and Science a Preview If you can’t see this video, click here. ASC [...]

Continue reading...

CCSS Professional Development: Great ideas for exploring the Standards

Standard Highlight

Front by Andrew Foster Twitter @abfosEd In the last few months I’ve come across some interesting ideas for exploring the Common Core State Standards. The most effective professional development is teacher-led and teacher-focused. Whether you are a classroom teacher doing your own research, a team leader organizing CCSS introductory activities, or an administrator trying to [...]

Continue reading...

How Complex is Complex? Raising Text Complexity a Grade Level

text_complexity

Front One of the main pushes of the Common Core standards is a push for increased text complexity. So, how complex is complex? The chart here (from Appendix A) compare the Lexile levels before the CCSS and now with the college and career ready standards in place. Text Complexity Grade Band in Standards Old Lexile [...]

Continue reading...

CCSS Implementation: No Substitute for Knowledge of the Standards

MathBook

Front by Andrew Foster Twitter @abfosEd For most schools and districts, the process of implementation with the Common Core State Standards will include a lot of discussion about professional development, new CCSS-aligned materials, and technology upgrades that will help schools teach daily technology use and prepare for the “next generation” digital assessments.  All necessary and [...]

Continue reading...